pathologist employment listing

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
stormjen said:
Would someone please view this employment listing and tell me if my eyes are deceiving me regarding the salary:

http://www.ohr.wisc.edu/pvl/pv_045270.html

If I am correct, I will proceed to hurl. (It would take me 3000 years to pay off my student loans. Perhaps I exaggerate, slightly.)

Welcome to academia.
 
52k per year? :laugh:

thats a total joke.
 
MacGyver said:
52k per year? :laugh:

thats a total joke.

It does say 52K plus UW Medical Foundation. I know at the hospital that I worked at in undergrad (a major research institution) they established a foundation that used various sources of funding to attract top faculty. Perhaps this is the same thing and the "Foundation" makes up the remainder of the salary. Just a thought.
 
Yeah I highly doubt that your yearly pay is $52k. That is a minimum, as it says, and this is probably a minimum that covers a bare-bones level of teaching and service responsibilities - like covering autopsies a couple of weeks a year and surgicals one week every two months. Many academic physicians are primarily researchers, but will be paid by the institution for doing a certain level of service work. So, if you have outside funding for research, obviously this is not part of the $52k. And if you increase your service work, probably more than $52k. And bear in mind that academic positions often have great benefits (lots of travel, health care, meals, etc) that are in addition to salary.

That being said, starting academic positions do not pay very well, and I don't think this is limited to pathology. Generally you start as a "clinical assistant professor" or "Clinical associate" or something like that (I'm not quite familiar with the complete hierarchy of titles). Increased seniority leads to higher titles and higher salaries. Starting academic pathologists don't often make a ton more than $90k per year, exclusive of benefits. Quite a few have outside funding, as I said. There are also bonuses.

Most positions in any kind of job will have salaries listed that don't really represent the full story.
 
Agreed...academia generally has low pay for starters. As you advance along especially in tenure track and bring in more funds, your salary will improve.

Oh well, apart from the financial aspects, I'm all for academics! But I can see how the risks associated with tenure track positions and the low pay really discourages people from academia.
 
AndyMilonakis said:
Agreed...academia generally has low pay for starters. As you advance along especially in tenure track and bring in more funds, your salary will improve.

Oh well, apart from the financial aspects, I'm all for academics! But I can see how the risks associated with tenure track positions and the low pay really discourages people from academia.

I agree that it's a tough choice between academics and private practice. Especially when the average private practice income (>3 years out of training) is $321,000 annually. I know of a pathologist from my program that just graduated and got hired (with a subspecialty fellowship) into a ~$300k/year position in private practice. That's a big difference from $80k/year, plus who knows how many fellowships. But academic path seems more exciting to me. Who knows!

http://www.allied-physicians.com/salary_surveys/physician-salaries.htm
 
Top